In the last several months cases have begun to emerge of Banks collecting on and even trying to foreclose on mortgages they have no legal title to. I am not talking about the legal standing issue that has been the subject of much litigation. I am referring to the practice of attempting to collect on the mortgage held and never transferred by mortgage banking corporations that failed in the first rounds of the mortgage melt down. Many of those mortgages were listed on exchanges but never properly sold to anyone nevertheless so called servicing lenders are attempting to collect on their own behalf. Isn’t that fraud?
- Bankruptcy Basics
- Chapter 7 Bankruptcy
- Chapter 11 Bankruptcy
- Chapter 12 Bankruptcy
- Chapter 13 Bankruptcy
- Taxes and Bankruptcy
- Student Loans & Bankruptcy
- Mortgages and Bankruptcy
- Correcting Credit Reports
- Ask Richard
Blog
Is it Mortgage Fraud?
May 25th, 2011Great News For Those Filing Foreclosure!
May 15th, 2011Q: There’s been some development in the Foreclosure area.
Richard Croak – Yes – many of the mortgages that people have, were passed through a company calling itself the Mortgage Electronic Registration Service. We call it MERS – a nominee and now, the state courts are now finding the nominee doesn’t really have the power to assign the mortgage.
Q: This sounds like good news for those now in foreclosure. Can you explain further?
Richard Croak – What was really going on – you go down to your mortgage broker – you get a mortgage. The mortgage broker – turns around and sells your mortgage to a mortgage banker. The mortgage banker has a relationship with a service company – a big bank such as Chase. That entity actually puts up the money. Everybody gets their cut. They then later on, sell the mortgage to bond holders. The mortgage table – you sign a note – and that nominates something called the mortgage electronic registration service company (MERS) – as the nominee for the party making the mortgage. The homebuyer, in effect, nominates MERS to be his or her representative on that mortgage.
Q: Sound simple. What’s the problem?
Richard Croak – The problem is that many of these entities have ceased to exist. So, when you go to foreclose, MERS comes in, but assigns for old mortgagee. Just before or just after the foreclosure. The courts are now deciding that MERS does not have the authority to do that.
Q: What does this mean to somebody finding themselves in foreclosure?
Richard Croak – If the Word MERS appears in your documentation – or if you get the paperwork and itstead of the company you expecting to see as the plaintiff, you see something calling itself the trust, come in, and we’ll determine if they even have the right for foreclosure.
Q: This sounds like good news for those who have filed for foreclosure.
Richard Croak – It’s excellent news for people finding themselves foreclosed because they may get through the process without all this intervening banking nonsense – directly to the people holding their mortgage and reach an workout agreement for there loan modification.
Q: Great update. They should call you as soon as possible!
Richard Croak Goes To Washington
April 27th, 2011Q: Richard – You’re always with current trends. What’s new?
Richard Croak – I just went to Washington to do some lobbying – for bill S-222 – which was introduced by Senator Whitehouse. The bill itself will authorize lost mitigation/mediation and authorize all bankruptcy judges to do so. That means – when you apply for a mortgage modification or concessions, you’ll have an automatic right to make that request.
Q: – What’s the difference? This sounds technical.
Richard Croak – Not so. Right now – the court has the power not to authorize the modification, but to wire the bank and, at least state, why they can’t do it. It puts somebody in the room with the debtor and the debtor’s attorney and the power to make a decision. Somebody with authorization.
Q: And, this is so important because loan modifications have exploded over the past few years – and are a big part of what you do.
Richard Croak – That’s correct.
Q: So, again, speaking the language to somebody wanting this kind of help – what does this mean?
Richard Croak – You know you’re at least talking to somebody who has the authority to act on a creditor. Right now when you file for a modification – your file goes to a person who reviews it and makes a recommendation – but usually doesn’t talk to you.
Q: And I know this is something you’re on top of – with or without this bill. Anyone coming into see you can be assured, their modification will be handled as directly as possible. Thanks Richard for your time today!
A Great Story About Creditor Harrassment. From Richard Croak – A Top Bankruptcy Attorney In Albany, NY.
April 9th, 2011Q: Richard – you have an interesting story about so-called “creditor harassment” of a client. Can you tell us more?
Richard Croak – We had a creditor who was trying to use the state police to harass one of our debtors for collection of a debt, so we filed litigation against that creditor, which they defaulted on – and now we’re in the process of having damages assessed.
Q: Interesting. This is after your client filed for bankruptcy protection which avoids such harassment. They had no business doing what they did. Have you seen this before?
Richard Croak – Once in a while. It’s not usually not one of the bigger creditors. But sometimes a creditor will attempt to use any means available. That’s what the bankruptcy court is there to stop and they step in, try to do it politely at first – but if the creditor won’t stop then we have to make some kind of sanctions against them.
Q: So, despite that your client did the right thing, this creditor did the wrong thing – and tried to get the money anyway, bankruptcy court notwithstanding.
Richard Croak – You can’t make the creditor obey the rules upfront, but if they break them, then there will be a penalty.
Q: Sounds like you really look out for your clients. So what do you think will happen to this particular creditor?
Richard Croak – They’ll have to pay attornies fees and have a fine levied by the court.
Q: – Richard – thanks for this valuable update!
DO YOU HAVE A POND ON YOUR HOME?
March 10th, 2011The precipitous decline in real estate values has hurt every homeowner, but as the saying goes every black cloud has a silver lining and this dark cloud may have left a pond on your home. Think I’m talking nonsense. Well the decision issued by Justice Clarence Thomas in the case of Nobelman v. American Savings Bank, 508 U.S. 324 (1993) where he came to the odd conclusion that a mortgage is secured except when it is not secured became the basis of the decision that Judge Jose A. Cabranes reached for the Second Circuit Court of Appeals. The Circuit decision in the case of Pond v. Farm Specialist Realty, 252 F.3d 122 (2nd Cir., 2000) was that if the first mortgage exceeds the value of the home the second mortgage becomes just another unsecured debt no longer needing to be treated as a mortgage.
Current estimates are that there are many thousands of New York homeowners whose second mortgage is voidable pursuant to the Pond decision. They just don’t know it. They know their house is under water they just have not been informed of what they might do to partly resolve the weight of the debt on their house. They don’t realize that in bankruptcy slang they have a Pond on their home.
The Two Most Frequent Reasons the Bank Cannot Foreclose
March 2nd, 2011First they do not own the mortgage. As odd as it seems in the United States today the party trying to foreclose a mortgage rarely has any stake in the outcome being either a representative or some totally third party to the transaction.
Second the bank is not very likely to have the necessary records. This is a recent development as for hundreds of years mortgages were recorded as were the various notices that the mortgage had been sold to a new lender. Not so anymore like as not the current holder cannot show the needed assignments between the original lender and itself. In other words no proof of ownership
Is the Treasury Secretary Living in the Same Country as You
March 2nd, 2011Press release received today from the US Treasury
“In the face of the deepest economic recession and housing crisis in decades, the Obama Administration has taken unprecedented action to promote stability in the market – keeping millions of families in their homes and helping millions more to save money by refinancing. But the data clearly show that the market remains extremely fragile,” said HUD Assistant Secretary Raphael Bostic. “While we cannot stop every foreclosure, we know that many responsible homeowners are still fighting to make ends meet. Through the broad range of programs this Administration has put in place, we can put help in reach to those homeowners as early as possible.”
The making home affordable program works for virtually no home owner. The HAMP applications are lost, ignored and virtually without exception denied by the lenders
Chapter 7 v. Chapter 13
June 26th, 2010Many people including most lawyers are confused about the relationship of chapter 7 and chapter 13 of the bankruptcy code. They both provide for and discharge of debts. Unsecured debts are rare paid in full in either chapter. The principal difference resides in how secured debts are treated. This usually means how the house and/or the car creditor are paid.
A chapter 7 filing technically involves a liquidation of the filing individual’s assets; however every individual is entitled to what are called exemptions. Congress granted the individual States the right to set exemptions with some restrictions where you live determines what property is exempt form the claims of your creditors. In New York the Bankruptcy exemptions are set forth in sections 282 and 283 of the Debtor and Creditor Law.
Every state has a homestead exemption in New York this is $50,000 (or $100,000 per married couple). In Florida it is 100% of the homestead value. The way you apply the homestead exemption is to deduct the amount from the home equity. For example if a home is worth $200,000 and has a $150,000 mortgage then the home is fully exempt because the equity is the same as the $50,000 exemption.
The true difference between chapter 7 and chapter 13 arises when the mortgage is in default ( mortgage payments are over due). Technically the chapter 7 filing cannot be used to cure the default. The chapter 13 filing allows the back mortgage payments to be paid over a period of time up to 60 months. So a $6,000 default would be paid in sixty $100 payments. This is how the law was meant to work, but many courts allow the home owner a brief period to cure the default in chapter 7. The only way to determine what the court will do is to look at what has gone before. Accordingly, experience counts in picking attorneys and particularly when the default is a serious one. Fortunately the Bankruptcy Court sets the fee which often results in a standard flat fee arrangement in all cases.
Foreclosure process
June 2nd, 2010Recently I have been getting asked how long the foreclosure process takes. There is no standard answer to that question. I work in New York which has what is referred to as a judicial foreclosure process. To foreclose the bank must commence a law suit. The cases often take a year or more. Right now the Courts are imposing mandatory conferences which delay the process and bankruptcy will delay the process further. It is not always necessary to win if you can simply not lose.
Pages
Archives
Categories
- 2011 albany floods (1)
- albany NY (1)
- Albany NY Bankruptcy Attorney (9)
- bankruptcy protection in Albany (3)
- chapter 12 farmers albany (1)
- fine levied against creditor (1)
- MERS Debacle (1)
- mortage modification (6)
- NY (2)
- problem with mortgages Albany (3)
- Richard Croak (7)
- stop creditor harrassment (1)
- Uncategorized (20)
- What Is Chapter 7 Bankruptcy? (1)